Open Call: Rhizome Microgrants 2017

 

APPLICATIONS

DUE AUGUST 14

BY RHIZOME

If you have an online artwork that you are trying to make or finish, or a story about the contemporary web that you want to tell, it’s time to submit a Microgrant proposal as part of our open call. For this year’s expanded Microgrants, our jury—Marisa Olson, Eileen Isagon Skyers, and Aria Dean—will select 4-6 projects to support.

Since 2014, the Rhizome Microgrant Program has awarded small grants for the creation of new artworks, online exhibitions, and other web-based projects. This program is run as an open call, and awards range from $500 – $1,500. Past funded projects have included a website critiquing a notorious internet misogynist, an excavation of the emails left behind by one of the largest corporate frauds in history, an exploitation videogame inspired by the Kardashians, and an analysis of the use of language in Egyptian social media during the 2011 revolution. This year, we invite proposals for online artworks and exhibitions from artists of any nationality. We aim to support a diverse range of experimental practices, and we particularly encourage proposals that engage with gender and internet culture.

In addition to the usual microgrants, we will also fund additional projects in these categories:

  • Projects that use Webrecorder—Rhizome’s tool to create and share interactive high-fidelity web archives—to create what we call “archival narratives.” An example of this type of project is our work with the Obama White House to reflect on the former president’s social media legacy. Grantees whose projects use Webrecorder will receive initial training and regular technical support from the Webrecorder team. This microgrants thread is funded by the Knight Foundation, as part of their significant outreach support for the Webrecorder initiative.
  • Artworks that engage with digital citizenship and the networked city, to be a part of Rhizome’s presentation at New Museum’s IdeasCity this September. Works can be video- or computer-based, and should be finished by early September.

Additionally, a set amount of programs funds, generously provided by Jerome Foundation, are intended exclusively for artists living in New York.

Submissions comprise a simple 150-word statement, a single sketch or image, and a brief statement of the project’s budgetary needs. Upon the close of the open call, the proposals will be considered by a jury, with four to six Microgrants awarded. The Microgrants application deadline is August 14, 2017. Recipients will be announced September 1, 2017.

This year’s jurors are Marisa Olson, Rhizome Editorial Fellow Eileen Skyers, and Rhizome Assistant Curator Aria Dean.

Deadline: August 14, 2017

 

Behind the Fold: Matthew Shlian’s Paper Art

By  | July 25, 2017

From his early experiments with folded book art, Matthew Shlian has sprung exuberantly in many directions. Kirigami—the art of cutting, folding, and gluing paper—is the medium he’s chosen to explore the paradox of how a two-dimensional material can create three-dimensionality. Paper has special properties that enhance experimentation because it can collapse, expand, and return to its starting point as if it has memory. Sometimes Shlian designs on the computer, using 3-D modeling programs, and he often finds use for flatbed plotter cutters, but he always folds, glues and assembles by hand. As he’s said in many interviews: “If you can hold something in your hand, you can understand it.” For his graduate thesis at Cranbrook, he built Misfold, a thirteen-foot, folded paper kinetic sculpture that, with the help of a robot, slowly and rhythmically rises vertically, stretching up like an unfolding paper lantern.

As a paper engineer, Shlian has designed storefront art for Levi’s and murals for Facebook. He’s partnered with Ghostly International, a gallery and store that combines music, technology, design, and visuals into one online platform. At C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital in Ann Arbor he constructed Unlean Against Our Hearts, a Tyvek half-torus shape which he calls “a paper slinky,” the circles of its two ends resting on perpetually rotating plexiglass turntables. At the University of Michigan, he collaborated with molecular scientists who study cellular membranes and with a team of engineers who are working to create more flexible solar cells. He’s given a Ted Talk and appeared on Sesame Street when the word for the day was “sculpture.” Last year he got an email from a girl who was getting a custom-built prosthetic leg from Bespoke Innovation. She asked if he could design something that would decorate the fitting that covers her peg and he sent on a tessellated design that fits around the prosthetic shin like a silver cuff.

For the most part, his sculptural works are constructed from white or black archival paper and they sometimes exist as free forms like Eight Emperors Bloom, his crisp, contemporary variant of a paper flower, which you can hold in your hands, or can been viewed hanging inches off a wall in pleated relief form. You can see the influence of Islamic design in his complex geometric folds: conglomerates of diamonds, triangles, or even curved shapes which can amass into starbursts. More recently, he’s experimented with what look like waves, slopes, and draping shapes, exploring the capabilities and limitations for stretching and rotating his material, always motivated by the desire to find out what the work of his hands will look like in the end.

Last January, he had a solo show at Florida Gulf Coast University, in Fort Myers, Florida that included a long, horizontal piece, Ara 117 (36 by 72 by 2 inches), which appears like the paper translation of a white-on-white quilt with a pinwheel center, light and shadow playing on the faceted geometric pieces. Because Shlian’s curiosity has taken him farther afield, as he puts it, “into the cracks between art and other disciplines,” the work is also about perception—how the eyes see structural organization in patterns even when there are deviations and irregularities. If you let your glance roam across the surface, you’ll see unexpected asymmetries everywhere.

Shlian is interested the way mistakes can lead in all directions and in the way the brain anticipates repetitions and understands mirroring. In a variant constructed from silver foil but similarly designed around a wheel-like center, he continues to probe the basic functions of light, form, shadow, and curves while the creases and folds look like the craftsmanship of a diamond cutter. One of the finest pieces in the show, Ara 211, stretches into the form of two open fans, one facing up and one facing down, with intricate pleats, stars, cross shapes, and fans within the fans. The work is virtuosic, standing as an homage to the long tradition of paper folding in our material culture, and at the same time it vaults ahead, into the vanguard where science, technology, and the arts combine.

 

The Turk’s Hat Dilemma

The Turk's Hat Dilemma

There is a series of paintings called Mexican Casta paintings, which reflect the various racial categories commonly recognized during the colonial era.  Versions of these categories seem to have been commonly used throughout the Americas at that time. In this painting, the union of a white “Espanol” with an albino woman results in children referred to as “negro torna atras” (black turns back), meaning that the woman’s African genes are expressed in the dark skinned children, even though she appears white.  For me it’s a window into a very weird world, but it apparently was commonplace at that time.  In this image, I’ve combined the casta painting with a painting of an apparently content and loving wealthy couple from the American colonies along with a peculiarly shaped inflatable water slide from the 4th of July celebration in Prescott, Arizona, replete with playing children and grandparents.

Mom and the Water Slide

x Mom and the Water Slide

Every 4th of July they set up these huge inflatable water slides on the lawn of a local school.  I thought it looked better this way..  Why do Baroque (and other periods) painters often have women, often naked, waving lengths of cloth in the air?  Were they happy? Sad? Signaling for a tailor to stitch them some clothing?